Rachel Junck

Rachel Junck, senior in chemical engineering at Iowa State, is running for Ames City Council Ward 4.

Rachel Junck earned the most votes anyone has ever received in Ward 4 and decisively beat her closest competitor in a blowout, 49-34 percent. This result would be a decisive victory in a federal or state election, but the archaic rules governing local elections in Iowa require a runoff vote because, although Junck won the most votes by far, she was just seven votes shy of a majority.

Rachel Junck has expanded democracy in Ames, increasing turnout compared to 2015 in Precinct 1 by 278 percent, Precinct 2 by 689 percent and Precinct 3 by 332 percent. It is all the more impressive that Junck accomplished this dramatic improvement in voting in these precincts with large student populations in the face of state-sponsored efforts to suppress the student vote.

The state of Iowa is unfortunately doing everything it can to suppress the political voice of students through repressive voter ID laws, efforts to close polling places on campus and more. It would be truly unfair if the clear will of the electorate of Ward 4, which is mostly students, was snatched away because students didn’t turn out again to vote in the runoff election Dec. 3. 

Despite all the efforts to stop students from voting, and the challenges to students that a runoff on Dec. 3 presents, I believe that students will not let their clear will be subverted. I am counting on students in Ward 4 to vote for Rachel Junck Dec. 3 again to ensure the clear will of the electorate is actually recognized. The people have spoken, and they have chosen Rachel Junck for City Council, but it’s still up to you to make it happen by voting Dec. 3.

Opinion Policies

Opinions expressed in columns and letters are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Daily or organizations with which the author(s) are associated. 

Feedback policy: The Daily encourages discussion but does not guarantee its publication. We reserve the right to edit or reject any letter or online feedback. The goal of the opinion section is to spark civil public discourse by publishing opinions based on facts that articulate an argument. The merit of a piece's ability to further public discourse, among other factors, will be considered when determining if a piece is publication worthy. 

Letter to the Editor Submission Link

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.