White House

The ISD Editorial Board explains the events leading up to White House Deputy Press Secretary TJ Ducklo's resignation and how this shows a trend toward personal and professional accountability in politics. 

Accountability. Responsibility. Answerability. Make a mistake, and you are liable for the consequences. Thankfully, most mistakes are rectifiable. Own up to what you did, apologize and accept the punishment. Do those things, and with genuine remorse, you’ll earn yourself a second chance.

Of course, not everything works out that easily and clean, as was the case for White House Deputy Press Secretary TJ Ducklo.

Ducklo made the mistake of threatening and verbally abusing, with misogynistic language, Politico's Tara Palmeri, a reporter who threatened to report Ducklo’s relationship with Axios' Alexi McCammond. McCammond is a reporter who had been covering Joe Biden’s campaign, which makes this a seeming conflict of interest.

Ducklo was suspended without pay for one week following his highly inappropriate remarks, prompting many people to question how serious the White House was taking President Biden’s threats to fire anyone on his staff that acted disrespectfully immediately. 

Biden’s White House indeed failed on that front. Ducklo should have reported his actions and offered to resign before his superiors even had time to fire him. As it was, it took a week and much public scrutiny for Ducklo to resign. That is a problem that Biden and the White House must correct in the future.

As for Ducklo, before offering his resignation, he issued a formal apology to Politico and Palmeri as well as sent a personal apology to Palmeri, stating “Last night on the phone with you I lost my temper in a way that was unprofessional, and I apologize for that. I should have done a better job at keeping my emotions in check during our conversation. It won't happen again.”

Upon the acceptance of his resignation, Ducklo issued the following statement on Twitter. 

“No words can express my regret, my embarrassment, and my disgust for my behavior. I used language that no woman should ever have to hear from anyone, especially in a situation where she was just trying to do her job. It was language that was abhorrent, disrespectful, and unacceptable. I am devastated to have embarrassed and disappointed my White House colleagues and President Biden, and after a discussion with White House communications leadership tonight, I resigned my position and will not be returning from administrative leave. I know this was terrible. I know I can’t take it back. But I also know that I can learn from it and do better. This incident is not representative of who I am as a person, and I will be determined to earn back the trust of everyone I have let down because of my intolerable actions.”

Ducklo acknowledged what he did and that it was wrong. He made clear that it was his actions he was apologizing for and not Palmeri’s feelings. (Saying you’re sorry that someone feels sad, bad, hurt, etc., is NOT an apology.) And he has accepted the consequences of his actions: in this case, his job.

Though not nearly as quickly as they should have happened, these are the events that needed to occur in response to Ducklo’s actions. 

Though only time will tell if Ducklo is genuinely sorry for what he did and does do better as he has vowed, his actions should warrant him a second chance at his career. Mistakes such as the one Ducklo made, as awful as it was, don’t have to cancel a career.

What matters is that, ultimately, both the White House and Ducklo held themselves accountable for his actions. That’s not something you see every day in Washington. This is a good first step toward accountability, responsibility and answerability. We are not there yet, but maybe we’re headed in the right direction.

We’re all human. We are going to make mistakes. Learning and growing from these mistakes is essential, but that can’t happen without acknowledging the mistake and atoning for it. Let us learn from this example and be better going forward.

Opinion Policies

Editorials are longer opinion pieces that are written by a group of community members recruited across campus who address relevant issues on a local, national and international level. Editorials are research-based. The purpose of the Editorial Board is to promote discussion concerning relevant issues in the community while advising on possible solutions. Topics are chosen via relevancy and interests of the members, which are then discussed by the Editorial Board in order to reach a general consensus concerning the topic or issue.

Feedback policy

If you have a grievance concerning the content or argument of the Editorial Board, please contact either Opinion Editor Peyton Hamel (peyton.hamel@iowastatedaily.com) or the Editorial Board as a whole (editorialboard@iowastatedaily.com). Those wanting to respond to editorials can also submit a letter to the editor through the Iowa State Daily website or by emailing the letter to Opinion Editor Peyton Hamel (peyton.hamel@iowastatedaily.com) or Editor-in-Chief Sage Smith (sage.smith@iowastatedaily.com).

Column Policy

Columns are hyper-specific to opinion and are written by only columnists employed by the Iowa State Daily. Columnists are unique because they have a specific writing day and only publish on those writing days. Each column undergoes a thorough editing process ensuring the integrity of the writer, and their claim is maintained while remaining research-based and respectful. Columns may be submitted from community members. These are labelled as “Guest Columns.” These contain similar research-based content and need to be at least 400 words in length. The following requirements should be met: first and last name, email and relation or position to Iowa State. Emails must be tied to the submitted guest column or it will not be accepted or published. Pseudonyms are prohibited and the writer will be banned from submissions.

Read our full Opinion Policies here. Updated on 10/7/2020

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.