grad cap light unsplash.jpg

Columnist Megan Ziemann examines the pressure to attend graduate school that hounds grown-up "gifted kids."

Editor’s Note: This is the first of two columns concerning graduate school conducted by Megan Ziemann. 

I chose the absolute worst time to second-guess my major. It was Winter Break before my second semester of junior year, I had just received feedback from professors on my final projects from the previous semester and one of those bits of feedback kept sticking. 

It was a message from my gender and consumer culture professor. He told me I would be a great candidate for a sociology or gender studies graduate program.

I had been toying with the idea of a Master of Business Administration (MBA) for the past couple of years, but it was that gender and consumer culture class that made me realize I was not cut out for an MBA. 

In fact, it was that gender and consumer culture class that made me realize I should have double majored in marketing and sociology. 

Or just majored in sociology.

That message was the straw that broke the camel’s back. I was sick of the pro-capitalist textbooks. I was sick of the speakers that would come into my classes and objectify their customers. I was sick of the “buy, buy, buy” culture I was being taught to value.

But I was going into my last few semesters at Iowa State. I had sunk too much into this marketing degree, and I couldn’t stop now. It would have been a huge waste of time and money.

And deep down, I like what I do. I like managing social media. I like connecting people with products, services or ideas that will make their lives better.

So, I spent that Winter Break researching. Maybe there was some sort of program that could marry my two passions — something that could harness my marketing skills but had a social justice focus.

As I was pouring over sales pitches from schools I could never afford, I realized my need for a grad program was stemming from something deeper. 

You see, I was a “gifted kid.” I’ve always been told I have potential, I was a joy to have in class, I required more work in order to be challenged. In elementary and middle school, I made being in the gifted and talented program a part of my personality (cringe). In high school, I took every Advanced Placement (AP) and dual-enrollment class I could. 

This is gifted kid syndrome. Adults formerly labeled as “gifted” have been told they must amount to something. They’re told they have something special, and if they don’t use that gift to go above and beyond in every aspect of their lives, they’re depriving the world of that gift. 

Gifted kid syndrome obviously presents itself in children as well as adults. Gifted children are prone to emotional issues like hypersensitivity and perfectionism, and if left untreated or enhanced by a gifted and talented program in the child’s school, that hypersensitivity and perfectionism manifests in the child’s adult life as well.

Let’s talk about these gifted programs for a minute. Honestly, I loved mine in elementary and middle school. I loved meeting kids who solved problems the same way I did. We worked together well, completed cool projects (hello Math Olympiads, Reading Relays and Destination Imagination instant challenges) and had a really nice community during a time when kids really needed friends. 

But I’m white. And almost all of the other kids in my program were white. And my school district wasn’t the only one with this problem. 

It’s systemic. A lot of gifted programs require some sort of entrance exam coupled with parental permission. These exams can be biased toward white children, and due to job discrimination the parents of Black, Indigenous and people of color children may not be able to be as involved as parents of white children. The programs themselves are expensive for schools to access, so the more affluent (read: the whiter) a school district, the better gifted program they will have.

Formerly gifted kids may also experience symptoms of mental illnesses like depression, anxiety and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). If you’ve read some of my previous work with the Daily, you’ll know that applies to me.

And if you know me outside of the Daily, you’ll know that I suffer from pretty severe perfectionism. 

I believe I do not have the privilege of messing up. I have to do everything right the first time, and if that isn’t the case, I am a failure and do not deserve the positions I hold. 

In my mind, I do not have the option to mess up college. I was gifted then, so I must be gifted now. And what do ex-gifted kids do?

They go to grad school.

My grad school dreams also come from a deeper insecurity. I get school. I’m good at school. I understand it, and I can excel in it. 

But I don’t know what industry is like. All of my jobs in college have been affiliated with the university in some way, and I did that on purpose. My comfort zone feels good. School feels good. Why leave it? 

Formerly gifted kids are stuck in a box. We’ve been told we’re good at one thing our whole lives, and when that thing ends, it’s scary. It’s time we separate school from our giftedness, because being gifted doesn’t have to mean being booksmart. You can be gifted in extroversion, gifted in music and art, gifted in so many other things that are not reading from a textbook and regurgitating information.

For those of us who are still thinking about grad school, I’m with you. It’s not my fault I genuinely enjoy reading academic jargon. I’m still keeping that grad program in mind — in fact, I will have a master's by the time I reach 30. 

But we have to apply the same scrutiny we have for gifted programs to graduate schools and their application processes. Never forget racism, classism and sexism are systemic. 

Having a couple of letters before or after your name does not make you the next Einstein.

Your degree doesn’t define you. 

What you do with it does.

Megan Ziemann profile pic

Megan Ziemann is a senior in marketing. 

Opinion Policies

Editorials are longer opinion pieces that are written by a group of community members recruited across campus who address relevant issues on a local, national and international level. Editorials are research-based. The purpose of the Editorial Board is to promote discussion concerning relevant issues in the community while advising on possible solutions. Topics are chosen via relevancy and interests of the members, which are then discussed by the Editorial Board in order to reach a general consensus concerning the topic or issue.

Feedback policy

If you have a grievance concerning the content or argument of the Editorial Board, please contact either Opinion Editor Peyton Hamel (peyton.hamel@iowastatedaily.com) or the Editorial Board as a whole (editorialboard@iowastatedaily.com). Those wanting to respond to editorials can also submit a letter to the editor through the Iowa State Daily website or by emailing the letter to Opinion Editor Peyton Hamel (peyton.hamel@iowastatedaily.com) or Editor-in-Chief Sage Smith (sage.smith@iowastatedaily.com).

Column Policy

Columns are hyper-specific to opinion and are written by only columnists employed by the Iowa State Daily. Columnists are unique because they have a specific writing day and only publish on those writing days. Each column undergoes a thorough editing process ensuring the integrity of the writer, and their claim is maintained while remaining research-based and respectful. Columns may be submitted from community members. These are labelled as “Guest Columns.” These contain similar research-based content and need to be at least 400 words in length. The following requirements should be met: first and last name, email and relation or position to Iowa State. Emails must be tied to the submitted guest column or it will not be accepted or published. Pseudonyms are prohibited and the writer will be banned from submissions.

Read our full Opinion Policies here. Updated on 10/7/2020

(2) comments

Steve Gregg

If you are a gender studies major, you have wasted your college education. All the grievance studies majors are not education, but indoctrination. When you send your resume out to employers with gender studies on it, they laugh. Nobody wants to hire a gender studies grad because it means that is a hire who will be disrupting the workplace with endless specious complaints and denouncing her male co-workers gratuitously in constant harassment complaints. Nobody in the working world with a serious problem to fix says, “We need a gender studies grad to figure this stuff out!”

I have an MBA. It’s worthless. The only skill I got out of it was I can read the Wall Street Journal. Employers are not clamoring for MBAs. Take a look at the job descriptions online. None of them say they need an MBA. After I graduated with my MBA, it took me a year and 922 resumes sent out before I snagged a job I could have gotten without an MBA.

My strong recommendation is not to go to grad school immediately after your undergraduate degree. Wait until you’ve worked a couple years and get a better sense of what you want and what the world wants. Find the intersection of those two things. Right out of undergraduate school, you don’t know enough to make a good decision. For all too many people, graduate school is a place to hide from the working world.

Also, you should never pay for your own graduate degree. Get with a company that has benefits that include tuition refund. It’s better to take your time getting your grad degree because you may learn that you’re pursuing another worthless degree. I was two years into an MIS degree when I realized I had never touched a keyboard for my assignments. I was not learning to do anything helpful to an employer. I was just learning how to play Trivial Pursuit with computer topics.

Let the buyer beware when it comes to degrees. The common assumption is that education is always good and more education is better. That’s false. I’ve been to seven colleges plus two years learning to fly fighters in the Air Force. Much education is mediocre or bad. There is little quality control. Only perhaps half of my classes really helped me make a living. Choose carefully.

Zuzeca Sape

That's a lot to unpack, Ms. Ziemann. Good content on grad school skepticism and the psychology of giftedness, but you muddle it with irrelevant asides.

1. "I believe I do not have the privilege of messing up"

Get this through your head right now: you not only have the privilege of messing up, you're not trying if you don't screw things up from time to time.

2. "[Gifted persons are] told ... if they don’t use that gift to go above and beyond in every aspect of their lives, they’re depriving the world of that gift."

Your gift is yours to do with as you will. You owe the world nothing. If you end up waiting tables at Waffle House, you're not a failure and you've deprived the world of nothing. What's most important is your personal happiness. Do what you love; your gift is not an obligation to others. There are successful paths that don't involve grad school. Be a scuba instructor or a plumber. Your occupational title doesn't matter. You don't have to pursue the academic treadmill. The world will survive without a Professor Ziemann. I knew a woman who earned her PhD and became a paragliding instructor. You do you.

3. "I’m white. And almost all of the other kids in my program were white. And my school district wasn’t the only one with this problem."

Wait, what? This whole aside was unnecessary.

Being White isn't a problem. *Lack of diversity* might be, but not being White.

"we have to apply the same scrutiny we have for gifted programs to graduate schools and their application processes. Never forget racism, classism and sexism are systemic."

I regret to inform you that Asians and Jews are disproportionately over-represented in academia and gifted programs. Likewise, women dominate not only Bachelor Degree completions, but academic fields such as Education, Social Science, Healthcare, and others. To what extent do we "apply the same scrutiny we have for gifted programs to graduate schools"? Are we only skeptical of fields dominated by Whites and Men or are fields dominated by non-Whites and non-Men worthy of critique as well?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.