Healthy life center

I will always vote for programs that provide for the greater good of all of the citizens of our community as long as they are well thought out and needed. However, I believe the Healthy Life Center (HLC) that we will be voting on Sept. 10th is neither of those.  

We have fitness facilities galore in Ames to meet the fitness needs of our citizens. These would include private sector (18 different facilities) and ISU fitness facilities (Lied, State Gym, Beyer Pool, Forker pool). Ames is recognized nearly every year for being a great place to live. Examples: Top Five Small Metro Areas for Retirees to Age Successfully 2018 (Investopedia), Top Five Small Metro Areas for Successful Aging 2017 (NCOA), Best Places to Live 2016 (Money magazine) and number three on Healthiest Cities in America 2016 (24/7 Wall Street). The list is almost endless. Would Ames receive these accolades if we were not meeting fitness needs? I think not. 

I believe the HLC is an overreach with the cafe, the kitchen to teach nutrition and the duplication of fitness facilities I cited above. And it is not free. 59 percent ($29 million) of the cost to build the HLC will be paid by Ames citizens via this bond referendum. Besides the increase in property taxes for homeowners, an increase will also be realized by rental properties (and businesses) which means if you’re a renter, be prepared for rent increases. There will also be admission fees to utilize the facilities. Many I’ve spoken with believe there will be no admission fees. Wrong!

The HLC is projected to run at a deficit of over $400,000 annually, even with admission fees. Where will those funds come from? You, the taxpayer. 

I respectfully urge the citizens of Ames to vote no on the Healthy Life Center Sept. 10th.

Barb Sanderson 

Opinion Policies

Opinions expressed in columns and letters are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Daily or organizations with which the author(s) are associated. 

Feedback policy: The Daily encourages discussion but does not guarantee its publication. We reserve the right to edit or reject any letter or online feedback. The goal of the opinion section is to spark civil public discourse by publishing opinions based on facts that articulate an argument. The merit of a piece's ability to further public discourse, among other factors, will be considered when determining if a piece is publication worthy. 

Letter to the Editor Submission Link

(1) comment

Jennifer Kurtz

Yes the taxpayers will pay that but quality-of-life amenities is the responsibility of local governments. They think at big scale and always try to expand the income network with these amenities which attract new residents, businesses and investment. Love from my business too

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.