Pregnant (copy)

Letter writer Luke Barnes response to Eileen Tyrrell's column. 

Editor's Note: This letter is in response to “S.B.8 is full of hate and Texas is not a pro-life state” by Eileen Tyrrell.

As most of us have heard by now, last week, the United States Supreme Court declined to strike down Texas Senate Bill 8 (S.B. 8), also known as the “Texas Heartbeat Act”. As of late, there has been a lot of confusion as to the ramifications of this law coming into effect.

According to the law, as of Sept. 1, it is illegal in Texas to preform an abortion in cases where a “fetal heartbeat” has been detected. This usually occurs within the sixth week of pregnancy.

The law also stipulates that those who preform or induce an abortion (like physicians) or aids and abets such activity (such as insurance companies) after the “fetal heartbeat” is detected may have legal action brought against them. This law is specifically worded so that it excludes the women who got the abortion, and rather targets those who made it happen.

Furthermore, the law makes an exception for the exceptionally rare medical emergencies in which the life of the mother is in danger. In such cases, the law would not apply.

Now that we know what’s in the text of the law, let’s move on to some other popular issues its critics like to take.

One such argument is that Texas isn’t pro-life because it has lower standard of childcare. If Texas was really pro-life, then they would do everything possible to protect already born children as well. The standard of childcare is determined by a number of factors; education, health, the economy, their environment, etc. Because of all of the factors involved, it is incredibly difficult to manage.

This does not excuse bad policy; they could certainly do better. In fact, every state can. But just because there is a chance that your child might have a sub-par upbringing, does not mean that you should slaughter them in the womb. That is a ridiculous line of reasoning. If you see someone going through a hard time, do you kill them? Of course not! You help them to the best of your ability to get through their situation.

Another popular argument is that it is a double standard to both outlaw abortion, and also have the death penalty. However, the two are incomparable. It is not at all logically inconsistent, that we ought to remove permanently the worst scum from our society, while also maintaining that the most innocent people imaginable.

Those who haven’t had the opportunity to breathe the air, much less commit a heinous crime, ought not be unnecessarily killed.

Luke Barnes is a senior studying history and is the President of the Students for Life club. 

Opinion Policies

Editorials are longer opinion pieces that are written by a group of community members recruited across campus who address relevant issues on a local, national and international level. Editorials are research-based. The purpose of the Editorial Board is to promote discussion concerning relevant issues in the community while advising on possible solutions. Topics are chosen via relevancy and interests of the members, which are then discussed by the Editorial Board in order to reach a general consensus concerning the topic or issue.

Feedback policy

If you have a grievance concerning the content or argument of the Editorial Board, please contact either Opinion Editor Peyton Hamel ( or the Editorial Board as a whole ( Those wanting to respond to editorials can also submit a letter to the editor through the Iowa State Daily website or by emailing the letter to Opinion Editor Peyton Hamel ( or Editor-in-Chief Sage Smith (

Column Policy

Columns are hyper-specific to opinion and are written by only columnists employed by the Iowa State Daily. Columnists are unique because they have a specific writing day and only publish on those writing days. Each column undergoes a thorough editing process ensuring the integrity of the writer, and their claim is maintained while remaining research-based and respectful. Columns may be submitted from community members. These are labelled as “Guest Columns.” These contain similar research-based content and need to be at least 400 words in length. The following requirements should be met: first and last name, email and relation or position to Iowa State. Emails must be tied to the submitted guest column or it will not be accepted or published. Pseudonyms are prohibited and the writer will be banned from submissions.

Read our full Opinion Policies here. Updated on 10/7/2020

(3) comments

Facts and Logic

Very well written!

Grant Becker

Fetal heartbeat is scientifically inaccurate ( A child-bearer's body is their own and decisions regarding their bodies should be theirs alone.

David Jackson

"What we're really detecting is a grouping of cells that are initiating some electrical activity," -Dr. Kerns

Electrical activity from the Mother’s heart? Nope. Electrical activity from a “grouping of cells” because those always just produce electrical activity, that are developing cardiac tissue, that are composed of DNA different from the mother’s because they’re part of her child’s body not her body.

A “child bearer’s” body…is bearing a child not just her own body. Thank you for admitting a pregnant woman is in fact carrying a child not a clump or grouping of cells that are part of her own body the Texas law does nothing to control.

It’s too bad there isn’t more detectable electrical activity in the grouping of cells in the craniums of those who want to be able to murder their offspring to avoid taking on the responsibility of raising them. They may actually be mature enough to exercise self-discipline and responsibility for themselves and their children.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.