Iowa Capitol (copy)

Multiple bills aimed to restrict the rights and protections of the LGBTQIA+ community have been introduced in Iowa.

Iowa’s 2021 Legislative Session started Jan. 11, and bills have already been introduced that would restrict LGBTQIA+ rights.

These bills show an incredible backtracking in progress for the state of Iowa and the United States as a whole. With President Joe Biden in office, many LGBTQIA+ activists were hoping this would be time for progress to resume on LGBTQIA+ issues from the Trump administration, which issued multiple anti-LGBTQIA+ executive orders.

It has not even been six years since same-sex marriage was legalized in the United States; now, lawmakers in Iowa are seeking to restrict the rights and protections of LGBTQIA+ people in Iowa.

So let’s take a look at these bills and what they mean.

Senate File 80, introduced by Sen. Amy Sinclair on Jan. 14, would require staff members from schools to inform parents if their children asked to identify themselves as different pronouns than what is associated with their sex assigned at birth. This action could potentially place those children in danger of homophobic or transphobic parents, who could physically or mentally abuse those children or kick them from their home.

This bill has been sent to a subcommittee, where both Sen. Jim Carlin and Sinclair are members.

House File 193, introduced by Rep. Sandy Salmon on Jan. 22, would make it illegal for medical professionals to provide treatments or surgeries that would alter a minor's appearance to match the gender they identify as. The bill would also empower and provide protections for conversion therapy. It also requires state government agencies to inform parents if their child exhibits any signs that they may identify as transgender. 

House File 187, introduced by Rep. Salmon on Jan. 22, would not require schools and churches to allow people who identify as transgender from using the bathroom or locker room of the gender they identify as.

House File 184, also introduced by Rep. Salmon on Jan. 22, would limit students to playing sports and intramural teams of their sex, not the gender they identify as. For example, students of the female sex wouldn't be allowed to play football for a school-sponsored team.

This would apply at every educational level in the state from grade school to higher education, meaning even here at Iowa State University, transgender and non-binary students would be affected.

House File 170, once again introduced by Rep. Salmon on Jan. 22, would allow people to discriminate on the basis of their religious beliefs and moral convictions, meaning this bill protects the right of an individual to discriminate against the LGBTQIA+ community.

Senate File 167, introduced by Sen. Jason Schultz, Sen. Jeff Taylor, Sen. Craig Johnson, Sen. Mike Klimesh, Sen. Ken Rozenboom, Sen. Tom Shipley, Carlin and Sinclair on Jan. 26, would require schools to get permission from a parent or guardian before they can teach students about gender identity, even if those students ask about that topic.

This bill has been sent to a subcommittee, where both Carlin and Rozenboom are members.

House File 272, introduced by Rep. Skyler Wheeler, Rep. Mark Cisneros, Rep. Dean Fisher and Salmon on Jan. 28, would remove gender identity as a protected class in Iowa. This means that if it would pass, people could discriminate against others because of their perceived gender identity in areas such as education and in the workplace.

Senate File 224, introduced by Carlin on Feb. 2, would restrict transgender and non-binary youth from using bathroom facilities relevant to their gender identity. It would force those youth to use bathroom facilities relevant to the sex assigned to them at birth.

This bill has passed through subcommittee and has been recommended for passage by that subcommittee, which Carlin is a member of.

House File 405, introduced by Salmon on Feb. 8, would restrict transgender and non-binary youth from using bathroom facilities relevant to their gender identity. It would force those youth to use bathroom facilities relevant to the sex assigned to them at birth.

These nine bills represent hatred, homophobia and transphobia from Iowa government officials against LGBTQIA+ Iowans; Iowans who are no different than any other Iowan under the eyes of the law. All Iowans deserve protection, they all deserve rights, they all deserve respect.

These bills, though none have passed as of the publication of this editorial, show a large step back from progress. These bills favor hatred and draconian ideals over love and compassion to the fellow person.

None of this is to say that Iowa’s government is completely against LGBTQIA+ Iowans — recently, there have been some bills introduced that are pro-LGBTQIA+ rights.

House File 120, introduced by Rep. Bruce Hunter, Rep. Rick Olson, Rep. Dave Jacoby, Rep. Marti Anderson, Rep. Beth Wessel-Kroeschell, Rep. Bob Kressig, Rep. Sue Cahill, Rep. Ross Wilburn, Rep. Art Staed, Rep. Jennifer Konfrst, Rep. Lindsay James, Rep. Mary Mascher, Rep. Eric Gjerde and Rep. Tracy Ehlert on Jan. 21, would recognize gender identity and gender expression as protected classes under Iowa’s Hate Crimes Law.

House Study Bill 11, introduced Jan. 12, would ban the LGBTQIA+ panic defenses. The LGBTQIA+ “panic” defense strategy is a legal strategy that asks a jury to find that a victim’s sexual orientation or gender identity/expression is to blame for a defendant’s violent reaction, including murder.

This bill passed unanimously out of the House Judiciary Committee. Notably, it included an amendment strengthening the language and banning all forms of the panic defense. 

House File 376, introduced by Rep. Molly Donahue, Rep. Ako Abdul-Samad, Rep. Liz Bennett, Mascher, Hunter, Anderson, Staed and Wilburn on Feb. 4, would introduce inclusive core social studies and sex education standards into the Iowa school system.

"According to GLSEN, curricula inclusive of marginalized communities creates a less-hostile school experience as well as increased feelings of connectedness to the school community for LGBTQ and other marginalized students," according to an Iowa Safe Schools Facebook post. "Inclusive curricula also benefits all students by promoting diversity and educating on the diverse perspectives and contributions of different identities in their local communities. The curricular standards proposed in this bill will lead to safer, more inclusive schools and better standards of learning."

These three bills are incredible steps forward for the Iowa LGBTQIA+ community, but they cannot overshadow the fact that the nine other bills were also introduced. They cannot overshadow the fact that hate still exists in this state, even with a change in administration.

Call your representatives and ask them to fight these anti-LGBTQIA+ bills because more often than not, there is an LGBTQIA+ person in your life, whether they are your child, your sibling, your parent, your friend or your coworker. They are there and they need your support.

Opinion Policies

Editorials are longer opinion pieces that are written by a group of community members recruited across campus who address relevant issues on a local, national and international level. Editorials are research-based. The purpose of the Editorial Board is to promote discussion concerning relevant issues in the community while advising on possible solutions. Topics are chosen via relevancy and interests of the members, which are then discussed by the Editorial Board in order to reach a general consensus concerning the topic or issue.

Feedback policy

If you have a grievance concerning the content or argument of the Editorial Board, please contact either Opinion Editor Peyton Hamel ( or the Editorial Board as a whole ( Those wanting to respond to editorials can also submit a letter to the editor through the Iowa State Daily website or by emailing the letter to Opinion Editor Peyton Hamel ( or Editor-in-Chief Sage Smith (

Column Policy

Columns are hyper-specific to opinion and are written by only columnists employed by the Iowa State Daily. Columnists are unique because they have a specific writing day and only publish on those writing days. Each column undergoes a thorough editing process ensuring the integrity of the writer, and their claim is maintained while remaining research-based and respectful. Columns may be submitted from community members. These are labelled as “Guest Columns.” These contain similar research-based content and need to be at least 400 words in length. The following requirements should be met: first and last name, email and relation or position to Iowa State. Emails must be tied to the submitted guest column or it will not be accepted or published. Pseudonyms are prohibited and the writer will be banned from submissions.

Read our full Opinion Policies here. Updated on 10/7/2020

(1) comment

David Jackson

“These bills, though none have passed as of the publication of this editorial, show a large step back from progress. These bills favor hatred and draconian ideals over love and compassion to the fellow person.”

-Editorial Board

Pat yourself in the back a little harder for how “woke” and “on the right side of history” you all are in the complete absence of scientific fact, I’m not sure they every student on campus heard you.

Reading through these bills it seems to me that the far leftist slactavists are worried parents might actually know what’s going on with their children at school before it’s too late to turn back, especially when it pertains to permanent life altering changes to their bodies. Oh no not that!

What’s the matter are you afraid you won’t have as many mutilated and permanently sexually damaged kids to push your agenda if the recent explosion of non-medically supported transitions stop occurring due to parents knowing what the hell is going on with their own children? According to the DSM-V, as many as 98 percent of gender confused boys and 88 percent of gender confused girls eventually accept their biological sex after naturally passing through puberty. Something that doesn’t happen if gender ideologies exploit sexually confused, internet addicted, self-diagnosing children by feeding their sex/gender dysphoria and pumping them full of 10x-40x the opposite sex hormones their body naturally had, or otherwise surgically mutilating and sterilizing them for life via a “reassignment surgery.” Not to mention a mental health professional even questioning if someone really is trans or just thinks they are would then be jeopardizing their license because it would be construed as “conversion therapy.”

Keeping parents from knowing that their child is adopting a belief that their anxiety and depression problems are the result of really being the opposite sex is wildly sick, but I’m not surprised this is where the LGBTQIA2 political lobby and their "anyone who questions this is a bigot" sycophants are taking things. It is not about people’s well-being it’s about political lobbying and public attention, and taking parents out of the picture and limiting the mental health resources that are considered acceptable will help produce an even larger next generation of permanently sexually mutilated people to hold up as victims. People who if being transgendered wasn’t their problem before their transition it sure as hell becomes it after their genitals are gone, a large number of which will commit suicide, but can still be useful to the cause as the subjects of emotionally charged rhetoric.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.