Video game opinion

Playing video games has become more than just a pastime. It has become a profession where gamers compete in tournaments to win millions in prize money. 

Whether it’s game applications on a cell phone or first person shooters on the newest console, nearly everyone participates in video gaming to some degree.

Regardless of how you feel about gaming, it has become a social activity as common as a pick-up game of basketball or a trip to the local swimming pool. And, just like basketball, it has grown a branch for competitive “professional” players. Competitive gaming for money or prizes, known as eSports, is a growing franchise in many nations across the globe.

The profession can be quite lucrative for those with the skill to succeed. Players win prize money in tournaments, as well as salaries or payments from team and individual sponsors. In International 3, the DotA 2 (Defense of the Ancients) competition earlier this year, the largest eSports pool prize in history was set at $2,000,000. Even split among five-man teams, that’s a hefty chunk of cash.

Individuals who make a living off of professional gaming get more than money, however. International prestige within the sphere of online gamers, as well as at-home fame are just some of the side-effects. In many countries, such as South Korea, pro gamers get all the recognition of pop music artists or athletes. And just as various athletes make their way to Summer or Winter Olympics, so may professional gamers in the years to come.

Satirical gaming news website Play4Real caused commotion on July 13 when they published a piece with the headline “League of Legends now official Olympics sport.” Many who were unfamiliar with the website or their form of humor took their article as fact. Online forums erupted with discussion over the “decision,” many in excitement, many in horror. The buzz quickly died down as everyone realized the piece was simply a joke.

However, this satire article did not appear from nowhere. Discussion over the worthiness of eSports as a professional sport or even as an Olympic sport has appeared in more serious contexts. Nearly a year ago, Forbes published an article on the topic, arguing that some games, specifically League of Legends and Starcraft 2, may become Olympic sports as soon as the 2020 games.

Gamer Institute CEO Danial Grzelak is interviewed in the article, and touches on the “virtues” of Olympics eSports, saying, “Almost anyone can participate, no matter their race, age, or gender.”

Though this may be especially true for eSports, the inclusivity of the Olympics is already strong in most events. Though most competing individuals may be of a certain age or race, the bottom line is if you’re good enough, you make it. As for gender, events are split into categories by gender already, making gender exclusion a non-issue.

Competitive gaming unarguably requires a lot of commitment, practice and skill, just as other sports do. However, the Olympics have always been a competition of physical prowess, measuring the strength, finesse and athleticism of its participants.

Olympic events such as synchronized swimming or dressage often endure much ridicule for not following this guideline of athleticism. Imagine the outrage if eSports were announced as a potential Olympic sport, considering the lack of physical aptitude necessary for competing. Any such announcement would arrive on the heels of the news that Olympic wrestling may not take place in the 2020 games, or any future games.

Though pro gamers and pro athletes share similar fame, wealth and popularity, the similarities stop there. Professional Starcraft 2, DotA and League of Legends players can get the desired recognition and money from international tournaments. Certainly the teamwork and skill required in pro gaming demand respect, but not the same category of respect that Olympians get.

Whether you scoff at the idea of pro gaming or religiously tune in to the international DotA 2 podcasts, it should be generally agreed that at no point in the future should eSports be included in the long list of Olympic events.

Pro gaming requires talent, but it’s more about strength of mind than of body, the traditional focus of the Olympics. Additionally, accessibility is a poor argument in an event where skill and skill alone is the deciding factor. Professional gaming has its place, but it isn’t in Rio de Janeiro at the 2016 Summer Olympic Games.

Opinion Policies

Opinions expressed in columns and letters are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Daily or organizations with which the author(s) are associated. 

Feedback policy: The Daily encourages discussion but does not guarantee its publication. We reserve the right to edit or reject any letter or online feedback. The goal of the opinion section is to spark civil public discourse by publishing opinions based on facts that articulate an argument. The merit of a piece's ability to further public discourse, among other factors, will be considered when determining if a piece is publication worthy. 

Letter to the Editor Submission Link

(1) comment

Jullian Ileto

There are many flaws in this editorial that I'd like to go over in the follow post, and some opinions that I disagree with.

First of all the title is misleading. The article discusses the notion of gaming as an Olympic event, rather than the legitimacy of gaming as an actual sport. I'm not sure if the editors made the title or if you made the title, but there really should be a correction made there.

The article mentions that the International 3 was held earlier this year. It omits the "The" in The International 3 and erroneously states that it already passed. In fact it will be held from August 7-11.

The article then implies that first place will receive 2 mil from winning. While that is not outright stated, the sentence was vague enough to cause some confusion. The prize pool is at 2.5 mil and rising because of community funding. However first place will not receive 2.5 million, but rather a percentage of that. The rest will be split amongst the runner ups.

It also, again through vagueness, implies that most players receive money and create a living through tournament winnings. This is untrue. Most players receive support through corporate sponsorships, who either support the player or the team that they are part of.

Most pro gamers do not, in fact, get the attention and fame of pro athletes or popstars. While that is a neat concept, even in South Korea arguably the Mecca of professional competitive gaming professional gamers are acknowledged, but not on the level of say... Kanye West, Lebron James, or PSY.

On the actual debate at hand...

To even consider something to be an Olympic sport, it has to be recognized as a sport. This wasn't mentioned in the article but I'll assume, for the sake of discussion and this argument that the author hold the view that Esports aren't "sports" per se. If they do then great. But the article sidesteps a very important issue that's arguably greater than the physical aspect of gaming.

Esports aren't popularly championed as sports. They're viewed as entertainment, toys, and leisure activities, not sports. To even be on the path to the Olympics, professional gaming needs to be acknowledged as a sport by the public. If this doesn't happen then gaming will never be part of the Olympics. Period.

If it does get recognition, then talks about it being an Olympic sport can be discussed in earnest. Until then though, it never will be.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.